The Necessity of Narrative, The Misapprehension of Myth

Every culture has narratives that illustrate their history, values, and aspirations. These stories are effective because they seem true, with recognizable characters–the merchant, the mother, or the disobedient kid, the little guy who takes on the establishment.

Then there are myths–archetypal stories of the supernatural–wizards, witches, and monsters. We’re supposed to know these creatures are fictional, their worlds imaginary, and their powers unattainable.

But in the past few years, ‘Murrca has had a problem distinguishing myth from reality.

I think that’s because no one has articulated a recognizable, unifying narrative that expresses shared values and a vision of what our nation should be.

I think that void created the hit cable shows “Yellowstone,” and its prequel, “1883.”

I find “Yellowstone” entertaining, like a “Godfather” or “Game of Thrones” played out against the gorgeous scenery of Montana’s big sky, complete with cowboys who tip their hats and say “Yes, sir” and “No, m’aam” and ride’n’rope’n’fight’with’ther’fists, jest lahk cowboys oughter.

“Yellowstone” grabs its presumed red state audience and twists their balls a bit with environmentalism, respect for Native Americans, and a multi-racial and mixed-gender bunkhouse.

But “1883” flat out panders to ‘Murrcan mythology.

Yellowstone’s patriarch, John Dutton, is presented as an embattled landowner nobly fighting to preserve his way of life, like a real ‘Murrcan. Never mind that he’s a millionaire who brands employees with the same immense red hot iron he uses on his cattle, and orders his foreman to take disruptive cowhands “to the train station,” which means driving them across state lines, stopping by the side of a mountain road, shooting them, and letting their bodies fall deep into the canyon below, presumably never to be found, nor missed.

Dutton employs ex-cons or others who have nowhere to go and no options left. We’re encouraged to think of them as disposable, so we don’t feel too bad when they go over the cliff.

I had an inkling of what I was in for when I started watching “1883.” Hint #1 was its stars, the married country music couple, Tim McGraw and Faith Hill. When the expected Civil War flashback came, I knew that McGraw’s character, John Dutton’s ancestor, would turn out to be a former Confederate officer.

I’ve only seen 3 episodes, but so far, the Dutton family joins group of German immigrants attempting the Oregon Trail out of Ft. Worth. The immigrants are portrayed as hopelessly inept, absurdly unprepared, and utterly dependent on their no-nonsense, gun-totin’ guide (“you mean to tell me you’re goin’ on the Oregon trail without a FIREARM?”), a PTSD suffering former Union army captain (that makes it even?), inevitably played by Sam Elliot. Commercial breaks offer ads from a farm supply store (featuring “morning in America” imagery, but including Black farmers and a vaguely Latino looking store manager! That counts, right?) and pickup trucks.

These programs capitalize on a craving for an American mythology of no bullshit, plain speaking, don’t tell me what to do, this land is my land, not your land (regardless of its history), good-guy cowboys who know who the bad guys are, and fight them.

Centrists and those to their left, take heed.

Ronald Reagan was very good at providing nostalgic, ‘Murrcan myths. Now, the warped, craven red monster his party has become will create any kind of myth, no matter how mendacious or evil, to gain or retain power.

The blue side seems to have lost any ability to present an alternative, unifying, compelling narrative. Identity politics coupled with a smug sense of superiority over everything west of the Mississippi (except California) and south of Chicago, and an unfortunate tendency to lecture others about words they must, or may not, use, submerges compelling policy proposals under layers of thinly disguised contempt for people whose support they need.

That’s a sure fire recipe for losing elections. It alienates well-meaning people who think of themselves as fair-minded, live and let live, “regular folks,” and turns them toward extreme ideologies on the opposite end of the spectrum.

Demonizing that opposite end is stupid, because the dark red side is doing a damn good job of demonizing itself, promoting crackpot conspiracy theories, undermining the electoral process, and standing idly by while thousands in their “base” end up in hospitals or graveyards.

The huge audience for “Yellowstone” stands in stark contrast to the indifference shown by critics outside that demographic:

The Guardian: “Yellowstone: The Smash-hit TV Show That Exposed a Cultural Divide”

The Pennsylvania Capital Star: “Yellowstone Might Be the Perfect Political Soap Opera for Our Divided Era”

Forbes: “The Rewards of Red-state Streaming by a Blue State Guy

Vanity Fair: “Here’s to Yellowstone, the Most-watched Show Everyone Isn’t Talking About”

Sigh. Leaves me wondering when the next season of Ted Lasso starts.

Until then, I remain,

Your I-just-finally-ordered-a-box-of-N95-masks-while-acting-as-my-own-gapers-block-at-this-seemingly-endless-train-wreck-of-discord-and-disease-still-hoping-we-can-find-our-way-back-to-an-America-we-can-agree-on,

Ridiculouswoman


6 thoughts on “The Necessity of Narrative, The Misapprehension of Myth

  1. Not much of a TV watcher so I am grateful to hear your review. I am less able to engage with popular culture than when I was younger- I also filter the news I take in as well. I want to stay current on the difficult events happening around me, but can’t get as emotionally hooked in as I used to. I am not indifferent- I want to be an informed witness. Partly that is getting older and knowing the next generations will have to take up the battered baton we pass along. Partly it is wanting to keep my mind and heart open no matter which team/tribe/party narrative is being spun. For that I cannot let myself get overwhelmed. Thanks for your excellent observations.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I wouldn’t recommend Yellowstone for a peace-centered person like you, Judi! It’s extremely violent, especially the first few seasons. Don’t be risk hard-won serenity in on keeping up with pop culture! Hope you and friends at Kendall are staying positive and well!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. It’s kind of funny but when I watch Yellowstone I comfort myself with the thought that all that stuff doesn’t and could never happen in real life. For me, it’s for entertainment and diversion only, plus I’ve always really liked Kevin Costner.

    I watched the firs 3 episodes of 1883 when they were available on the regular free Paramount channel and shown immediately following Yellowstone. I like Faith Hill and Tim McGraw (who by the way was at one time considering a run for the Senate as a Democrat in Tennessee, something that would be impossible now even for someone as popular as he is), though I found the acting of neither to measure up to their early movie roles.

    I’d also recommend a book I just finished. It’s called How the South Won the Civil War by Heather Cox Richardson. Part of its premise is that the noble image of the pre Civil War (Southern) planter was supplanted after the war by the Western cowboy but that both had the same characteristics. Before I cracked it open I disagreed with that comparison as well as the title but by the end I got her point on both. Check it out!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.